By Trevor Damyan, Commercial Mortgage Broker at Commercial Lending Solutions
Recourse and non-recourse describe whether a commercial real estate lender can pursue the borrower's personal balance sheet beyond the property in the event of a default. Recourse loans are typically priced 50 to 150 basis points inside non-recourse loans of the same leverage and term, because the lender has a second source of repayment. Non-recourse loans cost more but cap the borrower's exposure at the equity invested. The choice depends on the lender's preference, the borrower's personal balance sheet and risk tolerance, and the structural mandates of the sponsor's investors. Most institutional sponsors are required to use non-recourse, while smaller and individual sponsors often face the tradeoff explicitly.
Get Quotes from Both →Rate ranges reflect indicative pricing as of April 2026, sourced from active CLS CRE quote pipeline. Pricing is property, sponsor, and structure dependent.
Recourse wins when the borrower's personal balance sheet supports it, the lender pricing advantage is meaningful, and the sponsor's investor structure does not prohibit personal guarantees. Recourse loans typically come from banks and SBA programs and price materially tighter than the non-recourse alternatives.
Non-recourse is the default for institutional CRE financing. The pricing premium is the cost of capping personal liability, and for sponsors managing third-party capital it is structurally required. Agencies, CMBS, life co, and most institutional debt funds quote non-recourse as the standard structure.
Start with the sponsor's investor structure. Institutional GPs and syndicates managing third-party capital almost always have a non-recourse mandate in their fund documents. For those sponsors, recourse is structurally off the table regardless of pricing. For private capital sponsors and individual borrowers, the choice is genuine and worth modeling.
Calculate the dollar value of the rate spread over the hold period. A 100 basis point premium on a $10M loan is $100K per year of additional interest, or roughly $1M over a 10-year hold. The non-recourse decision is essentially buying $1M of personal liability protection. For sponsors with $5M of net worth, that is meaningful insurance. For sponsors with $50M of net worth, the math may favor recourse and the rate savings.
On construction loans, the choice is usually structural. Most lenders require full recourse during the construction phase regardless of whether the permanent execution is non-recourse. The recourse burns off at certificate of occupancy or at stabilization, depending on the loan documents. Sponsors should expect to provide some form of completion guarantee even on otherwise non-recourse permanent debt.
Bad-boy carve-outs are the joker in the deck. Non-recourse does not mean no liability; it means liability is limited to property value except in cases of fraud, waste, environmental issues, voluntary bankruptcy, or unauthorized transfers. Carve-out language varies materially by lender and is one of the most negotiated points in non-recourse loan documents. The rate premium is real, but so are the carve-outs, and a sponsor who triggers a carve-out trigger ends up with full recourse exposure on a loan that priced as non-recourse.
On a $14M Class B multifamily refinance with a private capital sponsor and a strong personal balance sheet ($22M net worth, $4M liquidity), two executions were available: a regional bank balance sheet permanent at 6.85 percent fixed 10-year with full recourse, or a CMBS conduit non-recourse at 7.65 percent fixed 10-year. The 80 basis point premium translated to approximately $112K per year of additional interest, or $1.12M over the term. The sponsor evaluated the recourse exposure: in a downside scenario, the property could lose 30 to 35 percent of value before triggering deficit liability, which the personal balance sheet could absorb without distress. The sponsor took the bank recourse execution, viewing the $1.12M of saved interest as significant relative to a downside scenario the personal balance sheet could already cover. A different sponsor with the same deal but a $5M net worth and $1M liquidity might have sized the recourse exposure as catastrophic and paid the CMBS premium for the non-recourse cap.
All deal references anonymize borrower and lender identities and use city-level geography only.
Recourse versus non-recourse is rarely a question of pricing alone. It is a question of whether the sponsor's balance sheet and investor structure can accept personal liability, and what that personal liability is worth at the deal level over the hold period.
Tell us about your deal. We will run it past lenders on both sides and send you side-by-side terms within 48 hours.
Apply for Financing →